TL;DR

• ​The digital agency industry has been shifting away from sub-10 FTE shops toward mid-sized agencies since 2018. This is reshaping the talent environment.
• Bigger agencies require more management, increasing demand for experienced Director and VP talent across the agency.
• Director-level hiring picks up sharply in the 25-50 FTE range, which is where most of the industry's growth is happening.
• Most founders haven't built the management muscle for the next size tier, and they tend to hire too late or by promoting from within out of necessity rather than competency.
• The agencies handling this best run multiple plays at once: building the growth engine before the senior hire (we can help), developing internal talent, hiring from adjacent professional services, and using fractional executives as a bridge.
• The middle of the industry is filling in. The talent market for the people who can run it is only going to get tighter.
• ​Catch me at De{code} on 5/6, where I'll run through how AI is reshaping the digital agency industry.

Come see me at De{code} 2026

Learn what our research across 214 digital agency professionals reveals about how the industry is navigating AI. Most agencies believe AI optimization will be as pivotal as the shift to mobile-responsive design. Our research data uncovered: how leading agencies are pivoting from deliverable-based models to strategy retainers; how AI is shifting team composition and production workflows; what agency leaders identify as their top barrier (spoiler: it's pace of change, not budget); and how agencies seeing real client metric improvements are structuring their work.

​Join us May 6, 2:50 PM - 3:25 PM EDT​

Agencies are getting larger

The digital agency industry is still mostly small (87% of firms have fewer than 50 FTEs), but the cohort mix has been shifting larger since 2018. The under-10 FTE bucket has been losing share. The 10-49 and 50-249 buckets have been picking it up.

Neat.

So what?

When the average agency gets bigger, the org. chart underneath it changes shape, and the talent demand changes with it. That has direct implications for agency owners trying to grow past the 25- and 50-FTE walls.

A few things happen as agencies move up in size:

The role mix shifts. Production stays roughly constant at around 62% of headcount across every tier, but the scaffolding around it changes. Operations grows from 10% of headcount at Studio shops to 15% at Large agencies, and revgen grows from 5% to 8% over the same range. That added headcount needs to be managed by Directors and VPs who actually know how to run it.

Each tier introduces a new management layer. At Studio (0-9 FTEs), the owner does nearly everything. At Small (10-24), the first dedicated project manager and account manager show up. At Medium (25-49), full-time directors of delivery, practice leads, and a Head of Growth all start to appear. At Large (50-249), the C-suite arrives: CRO, CMO, CFO, plus sales director, marketing director, RevOps, partnerships lead, and regional or practice directors. At Enterprise (250+), it's SVPs, portfolio directors, and a fully specialized C-suite. The cohort that's grown the most over the last seven years is the 10-49 group, which is exactly where Director-level hiring starts in earnest.

Founder-as-everything stops working sooner than most expect. Once an agency grows past about 25 employees, the owner has too much other higher-priority work to keep running production. The hire that replaces them in delivery is almost always a Director of Delivery or COO. The hire that replaces them in pipeline ownership is a Head of Sales/Growth or CRO. These are the two roles that tend to give agencies the most trouble. They either wait too long, hire too generalist, hire too inexperienced, or promote from within out of necessity rather than competency.

Adding a Director or VP isn't free. If a $150k hire doesn't unlock significant sales growth, client retention, or capacity, it shows up immediately on the net income line. The smaller an agency, the less room it has to absorb a bad senior hire.

There’s a ramp-up period for these new hires, during which they’ll be a drag on margins. Agencies need to plan larger cash flow reserves to cover this period, and then a bit more in case the hire doesn’t pan out. When they don’t, it creates major challenges for the agency, and they start making short-term decisions that aren’t as optimal for the firm.

The 30-50 FTE plateau comes with a major revgen problem. What separates the agencies that break this ceiling from the ones that don't is the development of a repeatable revenue generation engine. Many senior agency revgen professionals came up at founder-led shops where they never had to build a system, which is why the talent pool for effective Heads of Growth and CROs at this tier is so thin. The agencies hiring for it are competing for a small group of operators who have actually done it before, and so few actually exist.

Career paths become a recruiting tool for the agencies that have them. Industry turnover has run 19-23% for the last four years, and a meaningful chunk of that is senior people leaving small shops because there's no rung above Senior. Larger agencies can offer a visible ladder, a development budget, and the kind of Director-level seat that doesn't exist in a 12-person team. If you're a 30-person shop trying to keep your best people, you're now competing against firms that have an answer to the "what's next for me" question, and you need one too.

This all culminates in an industry where the middle is quietly filling in. The fragmented, founder-heavy structure we wrote about last time remains dominant, but the cohort moving from Small to Medium to Large is growing every year, and that's where most of the new Director and VP hiring is happening. M&A interest cooled slightly in 2026, but intra-industry consolidation has continued, and senior talent at the acquired shops continues to move up the ladder.

Options for handling this scenario

Build the growth engine before you need the senior leader to run it. The hardest version of this transition is hiring a CRO or Head of Growth at 35 FTEs, hoping they'll build a revgen system from scratch, and continuously iterating for quarters while they figure it out. The easier version is to put the early-stage system in place at 20-25 FTEs (defined ICP, documented sales motion, basic CRM hygiene, accountable lead generation, etc.), so the senior hire can improve and scale something that exists rather than invent it. The same logic applies to delivery: a Director of Delivery hired into a chaotic environment almost always fails. A Director of Delivery hired into a working operating system has a much better chance of succeeding. The growth engine also creates a steady stream of projects that gives high-potential seniors room to take on management work without reducing their utilization.

Want a full review of your agency's revenue generation strategy, system, and tactics?

​Check it out and see if it's a fit for unblocking your agency's growth.

Identify your next Directors before you need them. The best Director hire most agencies make is someone they grew internally over 2-3 years. That requires actually mapping the career path, naming the rungs above Senior, building the comp bands, and giving high-potential people stretch assignments with actual ownership (a small practice area, a key client, a hiring decision). Most agencies do none of this until they're losing the person they should have been developing. Don't wait for the resignation conversation to start the planning conversation.

Hire from adjacent professional services, not just other agencies. The senior talent pool inside the digital agency industry is thinning for the reasons covered above. Adjacent professional services firms run on many of the same operating models (trust-based revgen, billable utilization, project portfolios, client-services pressure, partnership dynamics) and have already built the management muscle that's missing in the industry. A few options that can translate well: management consulting (the more boutique ones) for strategy, practice leadership, and delivery operations; law firm operations leaders for COO and ops roles; accounting and audit firms for finance leadership and controllership; IT services and MSPs for delivery and practice leadership; SaaS customer success and professional services orgs for account management and retention. There is considerable cultural and industry-specific knowledge that needs to be instilled, but many of the operational processes can transfer well, and it’s a better option than not filling a critical role.

We’ve seen a major uptick in the percentage of agencies using fractional executives as a bridge. A fractional CRO, COO, or CFO buys time and lets the agency learn what the role actually needs before committing to a full-time seat. It's cheaper than hiring wrong, surfaces the underlying process problems that a permanent hire would otherwise inherit, and the fractional often helps recruit (and onboard) their own replacement. You can also work with them to build out proper systems and processes so your new hire won’t need to build them from scratch.

Treat the ramp like a project. Senior hires can be a margin drag for 6-12 months before they pay back. Agencies that don't budget for this end up making short-term decisions that undermine the hire's value (cutting their headcount budget, pulling them onto billable work, rolling responsibilities back to the founder). Build a cash buffer that covers the ramp plus a buffer for the case where the hire doesn't work out, and write down what success looks like at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days before the offer goes out.

Document the seat before you fill it. An incredibly common reason a senior hire fails at an agency is that the role lives in the founder's head. Putting the operating model on paper before the hire (decision rights, KPIs, weekly cadences, reporting lines, what's delegated and what isn't) gives the new hire a chance to actually run, and gives the founder a chance to evaluate them on something real instead of an evolving sense of "fit."

Consider acqui-hires. If a senior hire is going to cost $200k plus a 9-month ramp, buying a smaller specialist shop with the right Director or VP at the top is sometimes a better deal. You inherit a working team, revenue to offset the comp, and a senior leader with a track record. M&A is harder than it looks (margin compression, culture clashes, retention risk), but for the right talent, it's worth exploring.

There isn't one right answer

The agencies handling this transition well tend to run several of these plays at the same time: a fractional in a critical seat while internal talent develops, a documented operating model so the eventual full-time hire can actually run, and an honest read on which roles need outside experience and which can be grown from within.

The agencies that struggle with this usually weren't blind to any of this. They kept the management-planning conversation on next quarter's list one quarter too long, and the cost showed up as a stalled growth year, a senior hire that didn't take, or both.

The middle of this industry seems like it’ll keep getting bigger. The talent market for the people who can run that middle is only going to get tighter from here. The agencies thinking about their next two senior hires today will have an easier time than the ones still thinking about it in 12 months.

I hope surfacing this helps make it easier to navigate.

Until next time,